Secure AI Applications, Agents, and Their Connections

Models accept untrusted input, agents invoke tools, and AI-generated code reaches production faster than traditional controls allow. Assessments and controls address that risk across applications, agents, data and integrations.

Users Prompts and context Models Agents Tools and APIs Enterprise systems

AI Security Capabilities

AI application and agent security assessments

Threat modeling for models, agents, data, tools, and integrations

Prompt injection and sensitive data exposure testing

Authorization and excessive agency review

Secure tool, API, MCP, and agent-to-agent connection design

Model and third-party service risk review

Logging, monitoring, and incident readiness design

Secure development controls for AI-enabled applications

Controls for AI-generated code and coding assistants

Security requirements aligned to recognized AI and application security guidance

AI Trust-Boundary Map

Make the AI attack surface visible across users, models, agents, enterprise data, connected tools, identities, and external services.

Users

Prompts and context

Models

Agents

Tools and APIs

Enterprise systems

Security for Agentic Workflows

AI agents can act across enterprise systems at machine speed, which makes their permissions as important as their outputs. Securing agents lets the business adopt automation without handing over uncontrolled access.

Every agent is assessed for what it can access, how it authenticates, which tools it can invoke, what context it receives, where human approval is required and how activity is logged. The goal is to limit the impact of incorrect, manipulated or unauthorized behavior without removing the business value of automation.

Agent inventory and permission review

Authentication and workload identity design

Tool, action and data access boundaries

Human approval points for high-impact actions

Activity logging and monitoring

Security controls around an AI agent acting across enterprise systems

Trust Boundaries, Tested Controls, and a Risk Treatment Path for AI

Outputs show where AI systems can act, what they can reach, how they were tested, and which controls must be in place before and after release.

AI system and trust-boundary architecture

Threat model and prioritized security findings

Test plan, evidence, and remediation guidance

Identity, permission, tool-access, and approval requirements

Secure delivery and operational monitoring controls

Validation plan and risk treatment roadmap

AI Security deliverablesTRUST BOUNDARYAccessrequirementsTrustboundariesThreatmodelTestevidenceRuntimecontrolsTreatmentroadmap

AI Innovation With Controlled Risk

A prioritized view of AI-specific security risk

Clear control requirements for AI applications and agents

Better protection of sensitive data and connected tools

Security findings translated into actionable engineering work

Related Services

AI Governance and Compliance

A governed path for every AI use case, from intake to renewal.

Explore AI Governance and Compliance

Application Security

Security requirements delivered inside the developer workflow, with evidence captured.

Explore Application Security

DevSecOps

Automated security controls built into every pipeline and release.

Explore DevSecOps

Trace Every Path From Prompt to Enterprise System

AI systems are only as safe as the connections they can reach. An AI security assessment uncovers the risks traditional testing misses and the controls that address them.

Request an AI Security Assessment

Share the priority

Outline what is changing and why it matters now.

A focused working session

Context, constraints and goals are reviewed in one structured discussion.

A clear first step

A practical, prioritized recommendation follows.

Scroll to Top